Higher stakes all around: Conflict, inflation and volatility upend early year optimism

April 13, 2026

The world feels very different from when we published the last issue of The Takeaway just two months ago. The Iran conflict has significantly altered the interest rate landscape, inflation is rising again and the optimism that marked the start of the year has given way to a new wave of uncertainty.

But some things haven’t changed. AI infrastructure spending remains strong—though not without concerns—the grain markets are still challenging and geopolitical issues continue to dominate the conversation. Some things are new and some are old, but the stakes seem higher than ever.

Responsive Image

Interest rates

Rate-cut hopes fade as global tensions and inflation pressures rise

Jeff Milheiser

The U.S. economic outlook has shifted considerably in recent weeks, with a mix of geopolitical and economic factors virtually eliminating expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut. Earlier expectations for two to three rate cuts in 2026 have now dropped to near zero.

Treasury yields have swung dramatically as investors react to fast-changing headlines and mixed messaging. The Iran conflict is driving most of the pricing action, sending 10-year yields from just under 4% to nearly 4.50% before settling around 4.40%. Daily moves of 10 basis points—once unusual—have become routine as concerns about the duration, intensity and cost of the conflict fuel uncertainty.

Rising oil prices tied to the conflict are adding pressure. Correspondingly, higher gas prices—a major household expense—have reignited inflation fears just as price growth had started to slow.

And inflation is back as a top-of-mind issue for the Fed. The interest-rate futures market has responded by all but pricing out any expectations of rate cuts for the rest of the year, given the renewed inflation threat and higher projected deficits linked to war-related spending.

Political dynamics have also influenced sentiment. The government shutdown affected the economy and consumer outlook, while delays in confirming the next Fed chair add another layer of unpredictability.

Taken together, these forces suggest that rate relief is unlikely in the near term, with markets bracing for continued volatility as global and domestic uncertainties collide.

Jeff Milheiser is vice president, funding and investments, in CoBank’s Treasury group. He graduated from Purdue University and has been with CoBank for more than 23 years.

Responsive Image

Derivatives

Borrowers pause hedging as costs rise amid geopolitical turmoil

Eric Nickerson

Borrowers hoping for calmer interest-rate waters this year have instead found themselves navigating fast-moving river rapids. What once looked like a path toward lower short-term rates has been overtaken by a surge in geopolitical tension—led by the Iran conflict—and a renewed focus on inflation.

The shift has been significant. The reversal in expectations for Fed rate cuts has caused hedging costs to rise sharply. Two-year Treasury yields have increased by more than 40 basis points in a month, with longer-term rates also climbing. For borrowers, this means the cost of securing protection against rising variable interest expenses has increased just as many feel a greater need to hedge.

The result is a kind of paralysis. Borrowers who aren’t required to hedge are torn between wanting protection and hesitating at the higher cost. Discretionary hedging—once supported by hopes of falling rates—has slowed further since the conflict intensified.

In short, uncertainty is back in the driver’s seat, and many borrowers are choosing to wait and watch rather than lock in rates at today’s higher hedging premiums.

Eric Nickerson is CoBank’s head of Customer Derivatives. He has 25 years of experience providing financial risk solutions to corporate and financial institutions. He joined CoBank in 2019 after 19 years in the securities industry.

Responsive Image

Capital markets

Primary and secondary loan market activity cools as rates and volatility rise

Craig Smith (primary market) and Todd Helman (secondary market)

The primary loan market has shifted from early-year enthusiasm to a more cautious, yellow-light mood. Rising rates are creating sticker shock for borrowers. Deals priced at SOFR plus 4% in January are now approaching 4.5%.

Add in the Iran conflict, greater geopolitical uncertainty and concerns about AI disruption, and both lenders and borrowers have become more selective. Lenders are still lending—just at a higher cost—and borrowers are holding back unless they genuinely need capital.

The primary loan market remains active—especially among commercial banks and Farm Credit lenders—but activity is slower and more selective than earlier in the year.

It has also been a busy few weeks in the secondary loan market, which has experienced rapid changes. AI-driven disruption triggered a sharp selloff in software loans, a notable development given the sector’s share of the leveraged loan index. Software loans make up just 13% of the index, but they represent the largest single segment.

Paired with investor outflows—after rate-cut expectations developed—the market has been forced into a broad repricing of risk. Spreads have widened, especially for lower-rated borrowers, while higher-quality borrowers have remained resilient. Despite the turbulence, spreads for top-tier loans are still tighter than long-term historical norms.

As they say, it’s all about the context.

Craig Smith is managing director, Capital Markets, at CoBank. Prior to joining CoBank in 2019, he worked in investment banking and as an M&A, securities and banking attorney.

Todd Helman is a lead relationship manager for Loan Sales and Facilitation in CoBank’s Capital Markets group. Todd joined CoBank in 2023 from Waveson Capital. He also held positions at Huntington National Bank, BBVA USA and S&P Global Ratings.

Market Focus

Agribusiness

A grain market on edge: Fertilizer shock, drought fears and the season ahead

Marcus Wilhelm

If there’s one thing farmers know better than anyone, it’s that conditions can change fast. Right now, the grain market is a clear example.

The Iran conflict and resulting instability around the Strait of Hormuz have rippled beyond the Middle East, landing squarely on the balance sheets of U.S. growers.

The most immediate shock has been fertilizer. Prices jumped merely on fears the strait could close. The good news—at least for the 2026 crop—is that last fall’s strong application season means much of the fertilizer is already in the ground or in storage. An extended conflict, however, could affect the 2027 crop.

Early-season drought concerns add another layer of risk. Large areas of the Eastern Corn Belt are in the red, and roughly half of Kansas is already under drought designation. As planting begins, moisture maps are getting as much attention as geopolitics.

Between now and July, the market will be busy pricing in weather, geopolitical and cost-of-production risk. By midsummer, we should know whether this year’s crop will sprint or stumble toward the finish line.

Marcus Wilhelm is Western region president of CoBank’s Agribusiness banking group, based in Omaha. He also co-owns an 800-acre corn and soybean family farm in Unadilla, Nebraska.

Recent CoBank Capital Markets Activity

Aurora Cooperative Elevator Company

Aurora Cooperative Elevator Company

$310M Credit Facilities
Administrative Agent, Lead Arranger & Bookrunner

Corteva, Inc.

Corteva, Inc.

$1.25B Credit Facility
Administrative Agent & Sole Bookrunner

POET Grain, LLC

POET Grain, LLC

$500M Credit Facility
Administrative Agent & Issuing Lender

Digital Infrastructure

Will $700 billion AI infrastructure spend translate to shareholder value?

Jeff Johnston

How do you comprehend $700 billion? One way: line up $700 billion in $100 bills end-to-end and they would circle the Earth more than 27 times. Still difficult to understand?

Equally perplexing is that hyperscalers—Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Google and others—are expected to invest the same $700 billion in AI infrastructure in 2026 alone, up from $235 billion in 2024 and $400 billion in 2025.

This wave of investment is not just reshaping the tech landscape. It’s also boosting U.S. GDP and driving a significant share of recent stock-market gains. Some observers worry that such a large concentration of spending could inflate an AI bubble, but the financial signals suggest otherwise. Return on invested capital is rising alongside capital expenditures, indicating companies are generating real shareholder value.

The broader ecosystem reinforces that view. Nvidia forecasts more than $1 trillion in AI-chip revenue by 2027. Micron recently reported a 196% year-over-year revenue increase and expects stronger quarters ahead.

For those bracing for a dot-com-style collapse, today’s environment looks different. Demand is real, cash flow is strong and there is no excess capacity. The main risk lies in the increasingly intertwined nature of AI-era partnerships, which could lead to isolated disruptions if one major player falters.

For now, the AI supercycle shows no signs of slowing.

Jeff Johnston is lead economist, Digital Infrastructure, at CoBank. Prior to joining CoBank in 2018, he was an equity analyst covering tech, media and telecom and held senior management roles in the telecommunications industry.

Recent CoBank Capital Markets Activity

Data Center

Data Center

$110M Credit Facility
FCS Arranger

Data Center

Data Center

$85M Credit Facility
FCS Arranger

Data Center

Data Center

$125M Credit Facility
FCS Arranger

Power & Energy

Power-load growth, global gas price volatility: What utility companies are navigating now

Brock Taylor

AI data centers have quickly shifted from a straightforward growth story to a planning challenge for utilities, particularly as ratepayers focus on their bills. In response, utilities are developing strategies to accommodate large new load customers without shifting costs onto existing customers.

That shift is showing up in large-load tariffs and risk shielding contracts, including minimum-bill “take-or-pay” structures and “bring your own power” requirements, which obligate large customers to provide their own incremental supply. Some utilities are even framing these agreements as a win-win: when structured well, developers assume the financial risk if projects stall, and the added revenue can create meaningful rate offsets rather than rate pressure for households and small businesses.

At the same time, the natural gas and LNG markets provide a reminder of how closely U.S. gas planning is tied to global dynamics. The Iran conflict and disruptions to Middle East LNG flows sent prices higher in Europe and Asia, while the U.S. remained relatively insulated due to strong production, healthy storage and export terminals already operating near capacity. Aside from a January spike tied to winter storm Fern, Henry Hub benchmark prices were flat to slightly lower through Q1.

To that point, U.S. LNG exports are expected to rise to offset disruptions caused by infrastructure damage in the Middle East, which could take years to repair. That shift is likely to drive additional infrastructure investment in the U.S.

Brock Taylor leads CoBank’s Power, Energy and Utilities banking platform. He joined CoBank in 2006 and has held roles across multiple business lines, including Corporate Agribusiness, Electric Distribution and Power Supply.

Recent CoBank Capital Markets Activity

Dairyland Power Cooperative

Dairyland Power Cooperative

$450M Credit Facility
Lead Arranger, Administrative Agent & Sole Bookrunner

Dairyland Power Cooperative

Dairyland Power Cooperative

$250M Credit Facility
Lead Arranger, Administrative Agent & Sole Bookrunner

Wolf Summit Energy, LLC

Wolf Summit Energy, LLC

$1.1B Credit Facilities
Coordinating Lead Arranger

DISCLAIMER: The information provided in this publication is for informational purposes only and is not to be used or considered as investment research, a proposal, or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. Companies and transactions referenced in this publication are shown for illustrative purposes only, and the provision of such information is not a recommendation or endorsement in this context. Certain information contained in this publication has been obtained or derived from third-party sources, and such information is believed to be correct and reliable but has not been independently verified. While CoBank believes that factual statements in this publication, and any assumptions on which information in this publication is based, are in each case accurate, CoBank makes no representation or warranty regarding such accuracy and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracy in such statements or assumptions. Note that CoBank may have issued, and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with or that reach conclusions different from the information set forth in this publication. CoBank is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to your attention. Furthermore, the information may not be current due to, among other things, changes in the financial markets or economic environment, and CoBank has no obligation to update any such information contained in this publication. This publication is not intended to forecast or predict future events.

Recent Knowledge Exchange Reports